Dr. Arthur Janov
Monday, January 3, 2011
More on Language as Anesthesia
We have found that circuits from feeling centers to the top level cortex are stronger and more numerous than the circuits leading down from the neocortex. The implications are that language and thoughts do not change feelings so much, but that feelings do change ideas a lot. Thus the premise for so many insight therapies contradicts how the brain actually works. And explains why those who have undergone insight therapy (in all of its ramifications) have been self-deluded into thinking they are much better. The whole point is that the brain figures out a way to be self-deluded. Too much imprinted pain sets this in motion. And so thoughts go off in the direction of the feelings. If we feel like a loser then we give up trying to go to college or to study, in general. Or don’t try to get the girl or guy of our dreams. After all, “Who would be interested in me?”
We have to think, “Why would the brain grow itself in a certain direction; a direction that evolves to repress feelings? How is that a survival mechanism? Think: suppressing feelings helps survival. It has to do with blocking menace, the danger from terribly painful feelings, and
then we have to wonder where do those powerful feelings come from and what are they like? They are mostly imprinted from our womb-life and birth and are memories of what we had to do to survive. Those behaviors become fixed and drive our lives. When a fetus, for example, is probed (in amniocentesis) he withdraws and he shows signs of withdrawal. He grimaces as if in great pain, which he is. And his pain chemicals, stress hormones, rise radically. He is learning what to do in times of danger; withdrawal, removing himself from the scene, is one approach. Because the experience is life-threatening the system remembers it as a heuristic experience (setting guidelines for future behavior). In short, there is a flight to the head, to the intellect; a flight away from feelings and toward something that will reduce the danger. And what is that? Ideas and beliefs. It is the last in evolution and is our most precious defense. We can rationalize and theorize; we can project blame and mentally escape from the danger of terror that lies below so much intellectuality.
So in a strange paradox we flee to our heads to escape feelings and that flight is what becomes dangerous. We live in our heads or take drugs for further suppression, or we drink to help sequester our feelings, but no matter what the feelings never go away, grinding away inside, wearing down the system. They are treated as alien forces by the system; the enemy who must not be allowed to attack us from inside; hence we take blocking-medication to keep the attack from inside from happening. The drugs slow down or block the message from rising to the level of conscious/awareness. So we can think we are fine because we have blocked out of awareness of the painful feelings.
Language is the last evolutionary weapon we have against ourselves! Isn’t that strange? We develop something that can combat our own experience. And shunt it aside. And which allows us to pretend it never existed; and instead of feeling bad because of it we have the tools to make ourselves feel good; a self-deluded state that we all can share. That is what is universal, repression and denial. Wonderful.
Now how is that we evolved a thinking brain that anesthetizes pain? When we think about that too much we get into theology. I prefer science. We first impress pain into the system; we register code and store it for the future and then we develop a system to block it from conscious/awareness. We smother it with thoughts; and you thought they were a wonderful new addition to the human being. They are, and they are also this pharmacy of painkillers which is also wonderful. The system knew it could not go on under a terrible load of pain and find love and avoid danger. So it pushed it aside in order to remain stable and functional. Those who could not set pain aside are the ones who are dysfunctional. And what are those terrible pains? Lack of love, by my definition, of lack of fulfillment of basic need. So it must follow that we need love more than anything. We need it for life, for survival, for sanity. We need it to maintain the basic physical and physiologic structure. Otherwise, we don’t grow properly and our organs do not evolve correctly. Think of it: we manufacture chemicals that block the experience of pain. They do not block pain; that is another matter, although scientists are now close to removing the biochemical elements that build into pain. But most of us will settle for not knowing about it. Repression is the original denial. It denies reality, a reality that lives on a different level of brain function; on a different level of consciousness.
Look a the cult leaders; they hypnotize us with their promises of fulfillment, if not in this world then in another of their choosing. And it is indeed hypnosis; grabbing our need and twisting it so that we no longer are conscious. We follow blindly. We obey without question. And we do so in psychotherapy. They lull our critical capacities so that they are rendered useless, and then they move in to control and manipulate us.
One of the crimes of the century, not including the holocaust and other disasters, is the psychotherapy of denial; for that is what nearly every therapy extant practices. It makes patients more repressed, hence sicker. It helps bury reality, through medications which are designed for that, and through insights and beliefs that shut out the truth of our existence. I mean just a bit of neurology will tell us that the prefrontal area has a major role in blocking feelings. How on earth can we enlist it for change? We are putting the mask of anesthesia over the brains of our patients and we are calling it therapy. Let’s stop the crime!
Comments on “More on Language as Anesthesia”
I have received some comments on my blog about my "Epileptic Journey", and a few have expressed their regret that I have had to go through such a painful life to survive. One dear friend put it this way “it is Christmas Eve, and I am spending it with your pain and joy”! I had some of these issues in my mind when I read your last Reflections and my long life of pain and joy oscillated in my memory.
How has it been possible to survive? Exactly, the way you are describing how pain figures out a way to create ideas/projects/ambitions in order to remain alive and not to feel the pain. By using the anesthesia my brain produced, triggered by painful feelings, and of not being loved and of being put through an extreme birth during hours filled of horror and close to death feelings. In many cases, the self-deluded result paid off handsomely and brought me further from my real self, however, they created resources to go to Primal Therapy...
My ideas/anesthesia worked most efficient from, the age when I was 20 until I was 55. 35 years composed of 2-3 year periods when I developed, performed, and succeeded and finally failed in projects in different layers. This meant one professional job / career layer, one with partners and relationships and another with countless body treatments, etc.. I was stimulated by a growing apparent success, but every time the pain started leaking, then I had to escape into a new project. It was a perpetual mobile of pain and joy.
I was fortunate to have had an insight through The Primal Therapy that this was a life pattern of “escape from freedom,” which leads to my early death. I left this pain driven rat race and experienced how my epileptic seizures turned into birth primals and a new life ascended based on real needs. This life was less flamboyant but sustainable and with a new ability to see much further and to stop creating ideas and projects, which drove me. Now I try to run some projects to stay alive and to fulfill my obligations to my daughter, for example. In spite of all, the pain I have suffered has been worth it due to all the experiences I have been through and all the fantastic people I have met during my life. Though I would not again go through the humiliations my pain has caused me.
Ever since I read the Primal Scream, I have been allergic to cognitive therapists. Every manipulation they could do, I could do better myself, and they did not help me. However, a few times I enjoyed the beauty of such a female therapist, but she never committed any crime to me.
I can understand but not agree when you say that the traditional psychotherapy is one of the crimes of the century. A normative definition views crime as deviant behavior that violates prevailing norms- cultural standards prescribing how humans ought to behave normally. This approach considers the complex realities surrounding the concept of crime and seeks to understand how changing social, political, psychological and economic conditions may affect changing definitions of crime and the form of the legal, law enforcement and penal responses made by society.
I hope increasing the understanding for and the use of Primal Therapy might create a change of realities and as the culture changes, the political environment shifts and allocation of resources are influenced so that one day we can say that traditional psychotherapy is one of the humanities biggest mistakes ever and then if necessary criminalize certain behaviors. With the help of science, smoking, once so heavily promoted by Hollywood, slowly is being criminalized all over the world.
Jan Johnsson
January 5, 2011 5:07 PM
Arthur Janov said...
Jan The problem is when people go to therapy desperate for help and get nothing. Or worse, they get messed up. A problem is when you know better and yet you continue to do what does not work and just prolong the agony of the patient. The problem is giving someone false hope, providing mental illness/repression in the name of therapy. AJ
2011-01-07
Jan Johnsson said...
Art,
First of all, I think it is the right and responsibility of everybody (when grown up) to decide about their lives and destinies. Art Janov cannot do that. He can provide a voluntary and not mandatory alternative, which in many cases may help. Unfortunately, I know many who could not benefit and assimilate your help.
You said once about people in general: “I think most people are good” and so do I, even in the case of cognitive psychotherapists. In good faith the majority of them try to cure acute, emergency problems like most doctors being prisoners of an old paradigm. And they often fail.
What I cannot understand is that, during the last 30 years, science and research have not been able to prove the theory of your principles of “evolution in reverse” and establish a new paradigm. I found in my “Pandoras Box” a copy from you from 1980 (Brain, Mind bulletin, May 19, 1980) in which you and neurologist Michael Holden are talking about a “recently completed first large scale, systematic and long term physiological study of people undergoing psychological change”.
What happened to Michael Holdens “resolution index” first described in 1977? Why has it not been possible over 30 years to convince science, authors of psychotherapy handbooks and therapists of this new paradigm? I know that things take time but there must be a few resons which are not being approached.
I consider myself a living example of that your Primal Principals are working, but my story, of how I succeeded is tough stuff, and it has scared more than it has attracted. I would like to se more facts on the table!
Love Jan
January 7, 2011 5:55 AM
Arthur Janov said...
Jan: Hey thanks. You must understand. I just threw out fifty cartons of my writings cause I have no more room in storage. Since I write every day of the week I am surrounded by thousands of pages that I have more and more trouble organizing. So I lost the Holden stuff. Can you send me it. I even forgot what it was about. I loved Michael. He was so bright and so pure. Art Janov